Susan Aitken, Leader of Glasgow City Council, explains how leadership, courage and community have combined to make the city a global superpower of local climate action, as she prepares to step down following nine years at the helm.
The way to approach it is not to think of investment in climate action as something separate, but as something that underpins the kind of place-based transformation we want to deliver for our city and our residents. We want our residents to be able to live in decent, warm homes that are affordable, for example, so a commitment to delivering the energy transition and housing retrofit – particularly in our older properties – is part and parcel of that. It reduces emissions, but at the same time, it also addresses some of the biggest social justice challenges Glasgow has. It’s the same with our low-emission zone; it’s reducing emissions in our city centre, but it’s also addressing long-standing public health challenges.
In some ways, these long-standing issues are almost the primary reason for undertaking this work, with carbon emissions reduction being a side benefit. That’s not to downplay it – it’s not an accident, it is something we are very much focused on, but the way to think about it is that our approach to climate action is also focused the co-benefits we can deliver for our citizens and for places.
Glasgow is a once again re-industrialising city, but it’s a different kind of industry – a classic post-industrial city in many ways. We’ve got a lot of vacant and derelict land. We have communities that were literally abandoned and left neglected for a long time after a very brutal and rapid de-industrialisation in the 1970s and 1980s. Our priority is those communities and those places, and part of how we build resilience for future economic shocks and challenges for those people and places is also making them climate resilient and mitigating carbon emissions.
"I think – in fact I am certain – that the very loud voices who are platformed, are given disproportionate airtime and disproportionate space to spread misinformation and outright climate denial"
We can see that happening in other parts of the world, too – there has been leading work done in Scandinavia, for example. We saw a lot of Scandinavian cities come through the economic crash of 2008, and subsequent shocks like Covid for example, more strongly economically and often socially because they’ve made that investment in resilience. A big part of resilience is decarbonisation. If you think about it in that context, then investment in climate action is also investment in our communities. We don’t see them as being inimical in any way.
I was recently in one of our new Avenues. This is a project we have within the city centre that is reprioritising space in key streets and creating active travel pathways. It also brings elements like rain gardens so that we’re building resilience into these new streets, but at the same time, it represents investment in our city. We’re improving these places, creating the conditions to bring in more private sector investment, and we can see that happening. The private sector is looking at what we are doing as the public sector, and how it is delivering co-benefits over a period of time. For Glasgow, investment in active travel space, in improving the balance of public space between private traffic and other ways of getting around, is investment in a better future, and a more resilient future for the city and our people.
Every time we think about a climate intervention, we’re also thinking about the co-benefits and the benefits for residents. In the context of constrained budgets for the public sector, it makes it much easier to justify the use of those budgets for interventions that are climate related, but also link to many of our other priorities within the city.
It definitely helps. It doesn’t stop the noise around the culture war that’s going to be there, but it helps – and we’ve seen it particularly with our young people. We’ve done a lot in our schools and with youth groups and it’s absolutely clear that young folk in Glasgow see climate action as a major priority.
"All of the evidence, from polling and the work we do directly with young people, tells us overwhelmingly that they see climate action as a major priority"
Now, those are not the people who have access to forums in the mainstream media, who, in my view, are culpable in promoting climate denial under an umbrella of “it’s a choice between the cost-of-living crisis and the climate crisis”. In actual fact, addressing some of the interventions we have to put in place to address the climate crisis can also address the cost of living crisis if they’re done properly – particularly around energy costs, and maybe to lesser degree, food costs as well.
All of the evidence, from polling and the work we do directly with young people, tells us overwhelmingly that they see climate action as a major priority – but they’re not the only ones. We do an annual household survey every year of 1,000 people, across a very balanced section of the population, using polling methods to ensure a balance of people from different income backgrounds, different ages, different ethnicities, different genders. The results show us that the climate comes through very strongly as a priority. People want to see us making that kind of investment.
There isn’t always clarity of understanding that it doesn’t have to be an “either/or” that. Investing to improve places is also investing in climate action, and we still need to keep working on that communication piece. I think – in fact I am certain – that the very loud voices who are platformed, are given disproportionate airtime and disproportionate space to spread misinformation and outright climate denial. There’s absolutely no room for complacency around that, and we need to keep challenging the media outlets who are giving that disproportionate space.
Undoubtedly. I think there was a period there where you didn’t have to preface remarks with science as much because you understood that you’re talking to audiences who understand that this is something necessary and important. Now, it’s almost having to take a step back, going back to basics in some ways, and just reminding everyone why we’re here. We talk a lot about resilience and adaptation in Glasgow as well, and our climate action plan is now combined – resilience, adaptation, and mitigation are all in there together.
There is something about us having to talk much more, but it’s the right thing to do to talk to communities about how climate change is affecting them. Even in a moderate climate like Glasgow’s –where we haven’t in the past seen the extremes of climate and impact, where, by and large, people aren’t losing their lives or their livelihoods – people are being much more regularly inconvenienced. We are seeing much more flooding impact. We were already a rainy city – a rainy city with Victorian infrastructure in terms of drainage – but we are now seeing more monsoon type rainfall, which is overwhelming that that drainage system more quickly than ever before. We’re seeing flooding incidents, even if they’re relatively short-term flooding incidents, happening more often. For those in communities seeing those impacts, we can point to that and say, “this is climate impact, this is climate change that’s happening on your doorstep”.
Even with heat, which kind of gets laughed about in Glasgow, we’re seeing more days in the high-20s. Are people protecting themselves from the sun, drinking enough, eating properly, turning off the heating? We are getting warmer as a climate, even in a place like Glasgow, where we’ve always treated the weather as a joke because if we didn’t laugh, we’d cry. Now there’s no question that we have to start taking that more seriously.
What would be much better is if we can adapt and mitigate at the same time; build that resilience, but also try and put a ceiling on the extremities of weather that we’re seeing – and certainly on the impact that it’s having on communities.
In many ways, it’s becoming easier to talk to people about climate because it’s becoming less abstract. People can see those impacts happening in their own communities and on their own doorsteps.
Absolutely, and that’s something particularly that our young people have really led the way on. We are very lucky to be part of the Bloomberg Philanthropies Climate Youth Climate Action Fund, which has supported our ability to be able to support young folk in our schools and in youth groups to identify and take their own hyper-local climate initiatives like that. A lot these initiatives are around green space and food growing, but we’ve also seen them do some really fantastic creative work, like peer education through art, drama and songwriting, for example. We’ve seen a lot of work around recycling initiatives, too, and they’ve done some incredible things with reuse as well, into circular economy initiatives.
"We are definitely seeing particular sections of our communities identifying things that they believe they can do to make their contribution, and then we try and support that as much as possible"
We also see our business community and chamber of commerce do some fantastic work on the circular economy. As a council, we have provided grants to local businesses to be able to do their own step up to net zero – green business grants, for example, particularly around circularity.
We are definitely seeing particular sections of our communities identifying things that they believe they can do to make their contribution, and then we try and support that as much as possible, without getting in their way. We see ourselves as facilitators rather than and enablers of that work. The more that we can encourage community action, the more these incremental actions add up, while we focus on the major reductions that we need to see.
Domestic heat and transport are significant areas where we need to see that happening, but also some of the big jobs we need to do around sequestration, too. That is very challenging in a city like Glasgow, where we also have a housing emergency. Where we’ve got spare land, we want to be building houses on it, so we’re trying to think as creatively as possible about how we address what will be a sequestration requirement in our journey to decarbonisation.
We’re now in our second round of community shares as well – basically community investment into climate interventions. We’ve done it for community solar, we’re now doing it on trees and on greening as well, which has had a brilliant response. The first time round it was a target of raising a £1m, which we did quite quickly, with a lot of local businesses and local community groups investing. We know that in itself won’t decarbonise the city, but what it does is give our communities a stake in it and literal ownership of some of those smaller interventions that contribute to the whole.
First and foremost, don’t let opportunities go by. Looking back, it’s clear that we would not be in the place we are – which I can confidently say is as a global climate leader among cities – had we not had the opportunity of hosting COP26. We took the decision early, pretty much as soon as we knew that we were going to be hosting, that it wouldn’t be something that happens to the city, but that we would use it to drive and quantify our own ambition, and to really show detail and clarity around what we wanted to achieve in our climate action. At that point, those were high-level ambitions, but we could use the opportunities that COP26 gave us to make ourselves as visible as possible.
"That’s my biggest lesson: don’t let any opportunity go to waste and don’t be shy in asking for help"
The term we use in Glasgow and in the west of Scotland is asking for honours – asking for help, asking for assistance. We went to ICLEI and C40 Cities, we went to all sorts of different networks to explain we were hosting COP26 and wanted to really mobilise that and maximise the impact in our city to be seen as much as possible as an exemplar city. The response we got was absolutely brilliant. COP26 was where the response of the financial sector and the banking sector, and the role that institutional finance plays, came into focus. The Cities Commission for Climate Investment, which then became 3Ci, was launched at COP26. I was one of the founding board members, along with then Mayor of Bristol, Marvin Rees, now Lord Rees.
We really leveraged that and the capacity and knowledge of those networks to develop our own climate finance vehicles, which are now very close to reaching a point where we can go out to the markets and say, “come and talk to us”. We are ready and have the confidence in saying that we have robust climate investment vehicles that you can sign up to as partners to deliver some of these major interventions, particularly around heat transition. We want to combine that with the retrofit piece as well, which is something that all cities are wrestling with in terms of how to get it financed. That will be a major win and something we can point to that shows we are ahead of the curve in Glasgow. The reason for that is because we were Glaswegians – we were Weegie. We went out there and decided “shy weans don’t get any sweeties”, so we weren’t shy.
That’s my biggest lesson: don’t let any opportunity go to waste and don’t be shy in asking for help. If you can demonstrate that you are absolutely up for this, that you’re showing ambition, you’re showing vision, you want to do it collaboratively – you’re saying we need to do it collaboratively – then you’ll find there are plenty of collaborators out there who will be willing and eager to work with you, and to give you support to get where you need to be.
Why not try these links to see what our SmartCitiesWorld AI can tell you.
(Please note this is an experimental service)
How can councils integrate climate action with social justice and housing retrofit?What models finance large-scale municipal heat-transition and retrofit projects?How can community shares effectively fund urban greening and sequestration?Which engagement tactics increase youth-led local climate initiatives and participation?How do low-emission zones improve public health and stimulate local investment?