Analysis from CDP finds nature-based solutions can simultaneously protect communities from climate hazards, strengthen biodiversity and improve public health.
At a glance
Who: CDP; ICLEI.
What: Global environmental disclosure system CDP has published the analysis Nature for People and Places, based on data from CDP-ICLEI Track and the States and Regions Questionnaire.
Why: To show how nature-based solutions are becoming a core part of local climate adaptation as cities, states and regions around the world tackling climate change and nature losses together.
Where: The analyses is based on data disclosed in 2025 by 1,005 cities, states and regions across 80 countries and every continent.
Nature-based solutions are becoming a core part of local climate adaptation as cities, states and regions around the world tackle climate change and nature losses together, according to new analysis from CDP, the global environmental disclosure system.
The analysis is based on data disclosed by subnational governments to CDP-ICLEI Track and CDP’s States and Regions Questionnaire.
Nature-based solutions are actions to protect, conserve, restore, sustainably use and manage natural or modified terrestrial, freshwater, coastal and marine ecosystems. They address social, economic, and environmental challenges, while delivering benefits for human wellbeing, ecosystem services, and resilience, and biodiversity.
Nature for People and Places analyses data disclosed in 2025 by 1,005 cities, states and regions across 80 countries and every continent, representing 1.32 billion people. It finds that 55 per cent of cities, states and regions are already implementing at least one nature-based solution – such as ecological restoration, building green infrastructure, or afforestation – while 70 per cent of subnational governments with climate adaptation goals prioritise nature-based solutions.
“Cities, states and regions increasingly recognise that protecting nature and tackling climate change are two sides of the same coin”
The report shows that extreme heat, heat stress, urban flooding and heavy rain were the top climate hazards facing subnational governments, and that those taking nature-based solutions are simultaneously protecting communities from climate hazards, strengthening biodiversity and improving public health.
Solutions vary by region and the risks posed by local ecosystems. Local governments in Latin America and Africa focus on ecological restoration, those in Europe and North America prioritise more green infrastructure, while those in Southeast Asia, India and Japan place greater emphasis on afforestation and reforestation.
This nature-based approach to climate hazards is also improving peoples’ health: 65 per cent of subnational governments identify at least one public health co-benefit, such as better air quality, improved physical and mental health, or reduced impacts from extreme weather.
These are having a positive impact on the top health concerns identified by subnational governments (heart-related illnesses, vector-borne infections and diseases, and respiratory diseases), especially for the most at risk in society (identified as the elderly, vulnerable health groups and children).
However, there is a substantial funding gap for realising climate adaptation projects, with nearly half of cities, states and regions (46 per cent) reporting that budget constraints hinder them. In 2025, subnational governments sought $33.51bn for adaptation projects, with $2.85bn needed just for nature-related projects.
“Climate change and nature loss are not separate issues,” said Katie Walsh, CDP global director for cities, states and regions. “As climate impacts intensify, damaged and degraded ecosystems leave communities ever more vulnerable. Cities, states and regions increasingly recognise that protecting nature and tackling climate change are two sides of the same coin.
“Transparent environmental data can help partners identify where that investment is needed and direct capital towards projects capable of delivering solutions for building resilient communities”
“Our data shows that this is increasingly moving from ambition to action, with nature-based solutions becoming core adaptation measures rather than optional environmental initiatives. As serious climate action becomes mainstream for cities, states and regions, unlocking the funding they sorely need to achieve this, is an urgent priority for investors and governments.
“Transparent environmental data can help partners identify where that investment is needed and direct capital towards projects capable of delivering solutions for building resilient communities.”
Examples of nature-based solutions by subnational governments:
Maryke van Staden, director of the Carbon Climate Centre at ICLEI, the network of local and regional governments which partners with CDP on the CDP-ICLEI Track portal, said: “There is tremendous potential for synergy between climate action and nature-based solutions. With tighter public budgets, local and other subnational state governments need to be more efficient. They have an opportunity to design and implement win-win approaches for people and place, by exploring integrated climate action – resilience, adaptation and mitigation – in combination with nature, also to protect biodiversity. Green spaces help to cool cites. Green roofs and walls can insulate buildings. The range of actions is vast.
“Reporting to CDP-ICLEI Track, our global reporting platform tracking subnational climate action and investment needs, enables these analyses. We urge decision-makers at all levels of government and in the private sector to better understand options for positive impact by exploring this analysis.
“Stay the course and accelerate the tempo! We are here to support you with this essential work.”
Why not try these links to see what our SmartCitiesWorld AI can tell you.
(Please note this is an experimental service)
Which climate hazards are driving cities to adopt nature-based solutions?How are nature-based projects improving public health for vulnerable residents?Why do nature-based priorities differ between Latin America, Europe, and Southeast Asia?What funding gap is holding back adaptation and nature-related projects?Which projects combine restoration, drainage, tree planting, and heat mapping?