A report from European innovation engine EIT Digital explores whether digital transformation helps reduce non-green energy use or enhance consumption of non-green energy in the overall economy.
The lack of an agreed framework of measuring and modelling digital impact on energy consumption in various sectors leads to many opposing views when it comes to an analysis of digital technologies on green growth in Europe, according to a new report.
The innovation accelerator EIT Digital’s latest Makers & Shapers report explores whether Europe’s accelerated digital transformation helps to reduce non-green energy use or will an increasing digitalisation of business and industry on the contrary enhance consumption of non-green energy in the overall economy?
The report discusses opposing angles and opinions and aims to present policymakers with scenarios that support their decisions on regulatory frameworks leading towards a sustainable digital future.
The global agenda to achieve sustainable development is based on overall objectives such as Green Growth and the Green New Deal. The role of digital technologies to achieve green growth is, however, a topic of opposing opinions. Central to the debate, said EIT Digital, is the question whether reduction in non-green energy use through digital technology in the overall economy is larger than the increase in non-green energy consumption in the overall economy.
“Through existing and introduction of new measures, policymakers – the ‘shapers’ – could potentially lead us towards an ideal scenario where almost all effects can be directed positively”
EIT Digital considers four effects of digital technologies on energy consumption: the energy consumption of digital technology; the effect of digital technologies on energy efficiency overall, including rebound effects; digital technologies-driven substitution; and behavioural effects.
Based on these effects, the report develops four extreme scenarios along two axes: energy efficiency of digital technologies; and economy-wide energy efficiency:
Based on research of existing research and literature as well as interdisciplinary stakeholder discussions, the report comes to four main conclusions:
EIT Digital said that through existing and introduction of new measures, policymakers (the ‘shapers’) could potentially lead towards an ideal scenario where almost all effects can be directed positively, while limiting the costs imposed on the economic growth and energy prices.
It writes in the report: “This would require support to the digital technologies sector to strongly increase their energy efficiency and at the same time take measures to use these energy intensive digital technologies to reduce energy consumption by substitution in other sectors whilst limiting possible rebound effects.
“It is important to stress that measures should be highly differentiated by industrial sectors, also to minimise imbalances at global level”
“There are several existing initiatives and regulations in this direction that should be continued and reinforced by new measures, established in a dialogue with both industry and societal organisations.”
It cites a key new initiative as the Sustainable Product Initiative (SPI) that envisages a Digital Product Passport (DPP) exactly for the purpose of traceability and transparency. “However, it is important to stress that measures should be highly differentiated by industrial sectors, also to minimise imbalances at global level and possibly flight of energy producing and energy intensive business to less regulated countries,” noted EIT Digital.”
Why not try these links to see what our SmartCitiesWorld AI can tell you.
(Please note this is an experimental service)
How can policymakers develop frameworks to measure digital impact on energy consumption?What strategies increase energy efficiency in digital technologies across sectors?How do rebound effects influence energy savings from digital technology applications?Which economic sectors offer highest potential for digital-driven energy reduction?How can Digital Product Passports enhance transparency in sustainable product governance?