A new ranking reveals that Singapore, London and New York are marginally better prepared but governments and private sector institutions around the world need to do more.
Singapore is the city best prepared to deal with the disruptions that artificial intelligence (AI) could bring but no city is truly ready, according to a new global study by management consultancy, Oliver Wyman. It is calling for significant improvements to be made by governments and private sector institutions to fully prepare for the challenges that lie ahead.
The Oliver Wyman Forum Index ranked 105 cities in terms of their preparedness. Singapore has a score of 75.8 out of 100, followed closely by London (75.6), New York (72.7), San Francisco (71.9), Paris (71.0), Stockholm (70.4), Amsterdam (68.6), Boston (68.5), Berlin (67.3), and Sydney (67.3).
The index ranks cities on four key criteria: the quality of a city’s plan (vision); its ability to execute the plans (activation); the extent and quality of talent, education, and infrastructure (asset base); and how the interplay of activation and asset base are impacting its overall momentum (trajectory).
No city ranks among the top 20 across all four categories, and none appear in the top 10 across even three.
"City officials will need to work closer than ever before with local employers and educational institutions to tackle this challenge”
“Most cities plan to use AI to become ‘smart cities’ or the next Silicon Valley, but few focus on the bigger, strategic social and economic opportunities and challenges, such as the need to retrain people who may be forced to look for new work as a result of the broad deployment of AI,” said Timocin Pervane, co-leader of the Oliver Wyman Forum’s City Readiness initiative.
Kaijia Gu, co-leader of the Oliver Wyman Forum’s City Readiness, initiative added that city officials will need to work closer than ever before with local employers and educational institutions to tackle this challenge.
Besides ranking cities on their overall readiness, the index also ranks based on size, from megacities to smaller ones. While big cities often have vast resources, smaller ones are nimbler and can rise to new challenges more quickly.
“Proactive smaller cities can be just as well positioned for an age of AI because they are more agile,” said Pervane.
Other key findings included:
To complement the Oliver Wyman Forum Index, the Forum surveyed more than 9,000 people in 21 cities about how they think technological changes will impact their cities. Job loss was their top concern.
Globally, 45 per cent of respondents said automation could eliminate their jobs over the next decade and 42 per cent are not confident in their government’s vision for technological change.
More than half of respondents in Asian cities considered their jobs to be most at risk, compared to 44 per cent in Europe, and just 34 per cent in North America.
You might also like: